Trump faces possible legal difficulties as the PAC is investigated regarding election donations. Here’s the story.
Trump’s Post-2020 Election Donation Funds May Be Frozen
Reports suggest that former President Donald Trump’s post-2020 election donation funds may be frozen as Special Counsel Jack Smith investigates the fundraising behind Trump’s Save America political action committee (PAC).
Utilization of Funds Raised by the PAC
The investigation is rooted in concerns over the utilization of funds raised by the PAC and the possibility of misrepresentation during the fundraising process.
Andrew Weissmann, former FBI general counsel, commented on the ongoing inquiries and their potential implications. Speaking on MSNBC, Weissmann outlined a potential scenario wherein the investigation might lead to “pretrial forfeiture.”
This measure could result in freezing the funds in question, rendering them inaccessible.
A Threat Looms Large
The situation poses a challenge for Trump, as significant sums were reportedly allocated for legal fees for him and other individuals connected to him.
The Government Would Need to Confirm Such Claims
The prospect of pretrial seizure orders could apply if the funds were obtained through fraud, although the government would need to confirm such claims.
Who to Target
The investigation could reach much further than Donald Trump. It could extend to the PAC itself or individuals at lower levels, which could ultimately result in both civil and criminal forfeiture actions.
A Similar Case
The article parallels the case of Steve Bannon, a close ally of Trump, who faced charges related to fraud involving a fundraising campaign called “We Build the Wall.”
It Could Lead to Legal Consequences
The comparison underscores the possibility that misrepresentation in fundraising could lead to legal consequences.
The Million-Dollar Allegations
Trump hasn’t been charged with financial crimes in connection to this investigation. However, there have been longstanding suspicions that federal prosecutors were examining the millions of dollars raised by Trump’s team after the 2020 election.
Allegations include the idea that Trump fraudulently sought donations to contest the election outcome in court, despite being aware of Joe Biden’s victory.
The potential outcome of the investigation could resemble cases like Bannon’s, where restitution is mandated for fraud or money laundering victims.
Brian Kolfage, founder of the “We Build the Wall” foundation, was ordered to pay restitution for deceiving donors regarding the use of their contributions.
The Trial Date
Smith’s team has proposed commencing Trump’s trial on January 2, 2024, just before Iowa Republicans selecting their preferred candidate for the 2024 presidential nomination.
Trump Alleges an Agenda
Trump has criticized this timeline, alleging political motivations and interference with the election process.
On Truth Social, Trump wrote, “Only an out-of-touch lunatic would ask for such a date, ONE DAY into the New Year, and maximum Election Interference with IOWA.”
Trump’s opposition has since raised questions about the intersection of legal proceedings and political activities.
A Tough Position
Ultimately, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the post-2020 election fundraising activities of Trump’s Save America PAC could potentially lead to freezing funds through pretrial forfeiture measures at a time when Trump’s financial situation seems far from stable.
While Trump hasn’t been directly charged with financial crimes in this context, parallels are drawn with cases like Steve Bannon’s, where things did not go well for the defending parties.
Harm to Trump Campaign
The investigation’s timeline and potential implications could cause major harm to Trump’s 2024 campaign while he simultaneously fights other court cases against him.
“Here We Go Again” – President Biden’s Peculiar Conduct Towards a Baby Sparks Outrage, Fueling Alarming Questions About His Mental Fitness
Megyn Kelly, a well-known right-wing commentator, unleashed her fury on President Joe Biden for nibbling a baby’s shoulder, questioning his mental state and age. “Here We Go Again” – President Biden’s Peculiar Conduct Towards a Baby Sparks Outrage, Fueling Alarming Questions About His Mental Fitness
Kamala Harris’ CONFUSING Speech Draws Merciless Mockery and Criticism – “She Did It Again!”
Vice President Kamala Harris, known for her speeches, once again found herself at the center of controversy following her remarks at the 2023 Essence Festival of Culture. Here’s what happened. Kamala Harris’ CONFUSING Speech Draws Merciless Mockery and Criticism – “She Did It Again!”
Christianity in “Chaos” – Former Church Leader Warns of Political Interference Imperiling Its Future
A former top church leader has warned that Christianity is in “crisis” as the line between politics and religion grows ever closer. His comments have sparked a wave of discussion online. Let’s take a look at the full story. Christianity in “Chaos” – Former Church Leader Warns of Political Interference Imperiling Its Future
“Stop Accepting Migrants!” – Democrats Hit Hard as Voters Deal Crushing Blow Over New York’s Migrant Mess
A majority of New Yorkers, as per a Siena College poll, want the state to reduce the influx of migrants, with 58% expressing that New York has already done enough to assist migrants. “Stop Accepting Migrants!” – Democrats Hit Hard as Voters Deal Crushing Blow Over New York’s Migrant Mess
“This Isn’t Normal” – Biden’s Cognitive Ability Under Intense Scrutiny, Sparking Controversy Over His Ability to Lead a Country
President Joe Biden’s speech in Philadelphia caught the attention of many when a video clip surfaced showing him appearing confused and struggling to find the exit after finishing his address. Here’s the full story. “This Isn’t Normal” – Biden’s Cognitive Ability Under Intense Scrutiny, Sparking Controversy Over His Ability to Lead a Country
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Maxim Elramsisy. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.